Topic
Defense contractors handle Controlled Unclassified Information under DFARS 252.204-7012 and, increasingly, CMMC 2.0. These articles cover the engineering decisions that follow: where CUI is allowed to live, which cloud environment the contract requires, and how AI can be used without widening the assessment boundary.
5 articles · Defense Industrial Base

Generic AI hallucinates compliance documentation — and that's a False Claims Act problem. Here is the human-in-the-loop blueprint we use to take federal and DIB contractors from manual evidence chasing to a continuous, NIST 800-171-bound CMMC audit engine.

Defense contractors don't have 12 months. We compress CMMC Level 2 readiness into 30 days with secure AI enclaves, FIPS-validated infrastructure-as-code, and AI-drafted SSPs bound to live configs. Federal-first. SDVOSB Pending.

Cloud AI is a "FedRAMP Moderate" trap when CUI is on the line. Local LLMs are the only architecture that gives a C3PAO assessor a clean boundary, simple data flow, and zero training-leakage risk. Federal-first. SDVOSB Pending.

Pasting CUI into a public LLM directly conflicts with DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171, and federal control expectations. Here is the federal-first 30-day path to a local, audit-ready AI stack — for US Federal and DIB teams.

AI thrives on data. CMMC exists to protect it. The contractors who reconcile the two with local LLMs and FIPS-validated boundaries will own the next decade of DoD pipeline. Federal-first. SDVOSB Pending — UEI: YY2DR3KSENH7.
These articles describe how we build. If you have a live requirement, the Defense Industrial Base page covers what an engagement looks like.
Defense Industrial Base